Rename recipient properties for consistency
Updated `CreateEnvelopeReceiverResponse` and `EnvelopeReceiverController` to rename `SentRecipients` to `SentReceiver` and `UnsentRecipients` to `UnsentReceivers`. Adjusted corresponding lists and mappings to ensure uniformity in naming conventions across the codebase.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -202,22 +202,22 @@ public class EnvelopeReceiverController : ControllerBase
|
||||
#endregion
|
||||
|
||||
#region Add receivers
|
||||
List<EnvelopeReceiver> sentRecipients = new();
|
||||
List<ReceiverGetOrCreateCommand> unsentRecipients = new();
|
||||
List<EnvelopeReceiver> sentReceivers = new();
|
||||
List<ReceiverGetOrCreateCommand> unsentReceivers = new();
|
||||
|
||||
foreach (var receiver in request.Receivers)
|
||||
{
|
||||
var envelopeReceiver = await _erExecutor.AddEnvelopeReceiverAsync(envelope.Uuid, receiver.EmailAddress, receiver.Salution, receiver.PhoneNumber, cancel);
|
||||
|
||||
if (envelopeReceiver is null)
|
||||
unsentRecipients.Add(receiver);
|
||||
unsentReceivers.Add(receiver);
|
||||
else
|
||||
sentRecipients.Add(envelopeReceiver);
|
||||
sentReceivers.Add(envelopeReceiver);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var res = _mapper.Map<CreateEnvelopeReceiverResponse>(envelope);
|
||||
res.UnsentRecipients = unsentRecipients;
|
||||
res.SentRecipients = _mapper.Map<List<ReceiverReadDto>>(sentRecipients);
|
||||
res.UnsentReceivers = unsentReceivers;
|
||||
res.SentReceiver = _mapper.Map<List<ReceiverReadDto>>(sentReceivers.Select(er => er.Receiver));
|
||||
#endregion
|
||||
|
||||
#region Add document
|
||||
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ public class EnvelopeReceiverController : ControllerBase
|
||||
|
||||
SELECT @OUT_SUCCESS as [@OUT_SUCCESS];";
|
||||
|
||||
foreach(var rcv in res.SentRecipients)
|
||||
foreach(var rcv in res.SentReceiver)
|
||||
foreach(var sign in request.Receivers.Where(r => r.EmailAddress == rcv.EmailAddress).FirstOrDefault()?.Signatures ?? Array.Empty<Signature>())
|
||||
{
|
||||
using (SqlConnection conn = new(_cnnStr))
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user